A passionate lawyer crusader for people’s rights describes the deference by the courts to a bureaucrat’s expertise, thus preventing their testimony from being challenged by virtue of them being regarded as “experts” in their field. It is called “the standard of reasonableness”.
Read more
Lawyer James Kitchen presents his analysis on why the courts failed to uphold the individual's rights and also to explain the capture of professional regulatory boards in the country. "I don't care how many laws you have or how good they are on paper. They're useless without some sort of cultural morality about what is good and evil, and what is bad and what is right, and individual rights and how they should actually be respected".
Read more
Dr. Pardy’s testimony covers the dilemma of the “state” being based upon three different branches: legislature, the administration (executive) and the courts. He shows how officials have the discretion to decide the public good, and as their mandates included pushing vaccines and lockdowns, it was the assumption that this was for the public good
Read more
Janessa Blauvert has been working on upgrading her education since 2016, entering nursing in 2018. She graduated with honors but was not able to complete her clinical placement due to the public health emergency. Janessa is still unable to work in her profession as she is not vaccinated.
Read more