A passionate lawyer crusader for people’s rights describes the deference by the courts to a bureaucrat’s expertise, thus preventing their testimony from being challenged by virtue of them being regarded as “experts” in their field. It is called “the standard of reasonableness”.
Read more
Dr. Pardy’s testimony covers the dilemma of the “state” being based upon three different branches: legislature, the administration (executive) and the courts. He shows how officials have the discretion to decide the public good, and as their mandates included pushing vaccines and lockdowns, it was the assumption that this was for the public good
Read more